The time now is 11/22/08 - 18:46
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  
Calculator Running Log Uploads Smilies Calendar
FAQ Search    Articles Register Log in

ohio supreme court judge dui?


www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> Riff-Raff Hang Out

Post new topic   Reply to topic
robp
Pyromaniac
Reply with quote
Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Posts: 16242
Location: Waiting in line at the beer store...
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/05 - 10:51    Post subject: ohio supreme court judge dui?
Well... if anyone can pull a few strings I'd bet she could.

Associated Press


COLUMBUS, Ohio - A state Supreme Court justice drove off without permission after being asked to take a sobriety test, police and State Highway Patrol officials said.

The officers had to go after Justice Alice Robie Resnick and pull her over on Interstate 75 near Bowling Green in northwest Ohio on Monday.

Resnick, 65, of Toledo, was arrested and charged with driving under the influence and driving outside marked lines, said Lt. Rick Zwayer, a patrol spokesman.

Resnick failed field sobriety tests, including registering an alcohol level of 0.216 percent on a portable breath test administered at the scene, according to a patrol report. The blood-alcohol legal limit in Ohio is 0.08.

She refused to take an official evidentiary Breathalyzer test when she was taken to a patrol post and her driver's license was suspended for a year, although a judge can revise the suspension to a shorter period or up to three years.

The portable breath test is not admissible in court, Zwayer said.

A message seeking comment was left for Resnick, who did not attend court hearings Tuesday on a death penalty case and a medical malpractice case. Resnick, a justice since 1989, is the court's only Democrat.

Messages also were left for state Supreme Court spokesman Chris Davey and Resnick's attorney Sheldon Wittenberg.

Authorities said they received several calls Monday about a driver weaving across lanes on Interstate 75. A Bowling Green officer and a highway patrol trooper approached the vehicle after finding it parked at a gas station off the highway.

Resnick identified herself when the authorities approached but refused to take a field sobriety test.

"I informed her that she was not free to go," Bowling Green Police Patrolman Mark Hanson wrote in his report. "She thanked us, rolled up her window and drove off."

The officers followed her back onto the highway and pulled her over in her state-owned 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee.

"I've not been drinking," Resnick says on a tape of the stop released by the patrol. "I've always said a Supreme Court justice should have a highway patrolman drive them."

A state trooper wrote he noticed "a strong odor of alcohol" on her when they pulled her over.

Resnick's husband, former 6th Ohio District Court of Appeals Judge Melvin Resnick, told The (Toledo) Blade that his wife was "very, very upset."

"She had recrimination problems last night," Melvin Resnick said Tuesday. "It's just a bad incident."

Court officials said there is no automatic disciplinary action when a justice is charged with driving under the influence.

Resnick, who previously served as an assistant county prosecutor, a municipal judge and a state appeals court judge, has voted in a handful of drunken driving cases with the Supreme Court.

In 1996, for example, she wrote the majority opinion in a case that said police do not have to tell people suspected of drunken driving that they have the right to a second, independent blood alcohol test.

Her arrest came just days after the conclusion of a long-running court battle over an unsuccessful attempt by business groups to unseat her in 2000. On Friday, the Ohio Chamber of Commerce was forced to disclose who contributed to the advertising campaign.

Faced with $25,000 in daily fines, the chamber complied with a court order by providing a list of 383 donors who gave $4.2 million to a chamber organization that raised money to defeat Resnick.

Business groups dislike Resnick because of votes she cast that went against the insurance industry and companies trying to limit personal injury lawsuits.

The campaign included a television ad showing a female justice changing a vote after bags of money are dumped on her desk.

Since Republicans regained control of the court in 2003, justices have made a handful of rulings that businesses say are more favorable to their interests.
JACKED UP
PRESIDENT
Reply with quote
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 21238
Location: www.johnnydu.com
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/05 - 12:00    Post subject:
Interesting to say the least,
Cappy
Excelent
Reply with quote
Joined: 16 May 2002
Posts: 27368
Location: Spreadsheetylvania
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/05 - 12:09    Post subject:
.0216 Shocked
Maddies Wench
Flailing Homosapiens
Reply with quote
Joined: 12 Jun 2003
Posts: 6103
Location: Seeking out the poorer quarters where the ragged people go.
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/05 - 12:11    Post subject:
I'm always amazed when people are so surprised that people like Judges and Priests and well, the President even, make mistakes.

He's a judge, not Jesus.
robp
Pyromaniac
Reply with quote
Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Posts: 16242
Location: Waiting in line at the beer store...
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/05 - 12:20    Post subject:
Maddie's Wench wrote:
I'm always amazed when people are so surprised that people like Judges and Priests and well, the President even, make mistakes.

He's a judge, not Jesus.


He's a she, not that it matters....
Maddies Wench
Flailing Homosapiens
Reply with quote
Joined: 12 Jun 2003
Posts: 6103
Location: Seeking out the poorer quarters where the ragged people go.
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/05 - 12:23    Post subject:
robp wrote:


He's a she, not that it matters....


If it didn't matter, why did you point it out?
robp
Pyromaniac
Reply with quote
Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Posts: 16242
Location: Waiting in line at the beer store...
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/05 - 12:24    Post subject:
Maddie's Wench wrote:


If it didn't matter, why did you point it out?


because i can be a real dick at times
purple hayes
Frightened Inmate #2
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 14462
Location: ON YOUR LEFT!
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/05 - 12:24    Post subject:
Maddie's Wench wrote:
I'm always amazed when people are so surprised that people like Judges and Priests and well, the President even, make mistakes.


It wasn't a mistake. If you drink and get behind the wheel, it's intentional.
Cappy
Excelent
Reply with quote
Joined: 16 May 2002
Posts: 27368
Location: Spreadsheetylvania
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/05 - 12:29    Post subject:
purple hayes wrote:


It wasn't a mistake. If you drink and get behind the wheel, it's intentional.


and at her BAC, there was no way in hell that could not have know she had had to much to drink.
Maddies Wench
Flailing Homosapiens
Reply with quote
Joined: 12 Jun 2003
Posts: 6103
Location: Seeking out the poorer quarters where the ragged people go.
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/05 - 12:30    Post subject:
purple hayes wrote:


It wasn't a mistake. If you drink and get behind the wheel, it's intentional.



Bad choice making, then. I'm not saying that what SHE (rob) did wasn't wrong. I'm not saying that she's not maybe the biggest butt munch in town. All I am saying is that people are human, regardless of their station in life so then their "bad choice making" should not be a surprise.



Jebus Christmas.
RangerG
Bounty Hunter
Reply with quote
Joined: 13 Mar 2003
Posts: 7301
Location: Gmail Server Number 126
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/05 - 13:31    Post subject:
Maddie's Wench wrote:


If it didn't matter, why did you point it out?


Shocked



*Ranger ducks before tupperware starts to fly*

Watch the lids rob...watch the lids...they hurt like the dickens....

And for gosh sakes...make sure you know where her cats are....claws in the family jewels are no laughing matter...

Confused
msparks
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 3182
Location: Jammin' at the Frim Fram, Frippin' in the Krotz
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/05 - 13:40    Post subject:
Hey, I saw the copcam video! For the BAC, she was driving pretty well! I've seen worse from sober drivers.

Yeah, ol' Alice really got her, uh, finger stuck in the wringer this time. And when she stands up in court, she'll be treated like any other person. Right?

I'm going to wager that she loses some money is permitted to drive to/from work only for six months...if it's her first time. Takers?
robp
Pyromaniac
Reply with quote
Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Posts: 16242
Location: Waiting in line at the beer store...
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/05 - 14:21    Post subject:
msparks wrote:
Hey, I saw the copcam video! For the BAC, she was driving pretty well! I've seen worse from sober drivers.

Yeah, ol' Alice really got her, uh, finger stuck in the wringer this time. And when she stands up in court, she'll be treated like any other person. Right?

I'm going to wager that she loses some money is permitted to drive to/from work only for six months...if it's her first time. Takers?


Pretty standard results for first time offenders in buckeye land.
copteacher
Adjunct
Reply with quote
Joined: 08 Jun 2002
Posts: 20588
Location: Teaching in the Halls of Justice
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/05 - 20:00    Post subject:
that BAC is very high. There is no doubt though the judge will be given a suspension on the license and likely short probation.

I see no reason why the judge still cant serve.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT - 4 Hours

www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> Riff-Raff Hang Out

Page 1 of 1

Related topics:
Supremes
Victorias secret loses suit at Supreme Court
I am the Supreme Motivatah!
Supreme Court
The Supremes