The time now is 11/23/08 - 16:15
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  
Calculator Running Log Uploads Smilies Calendar
FAQ Search    Articles Register Log in

it's plus 6 today (that's 45.2 US degrees) *cough*


www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> Riff-Raff Hang Out Goto page Previous   1, 2

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Sandy Cheeks
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 4605
Location: in the city that never sleeps
| Back to top
PostPosted: 01/08/03 - 01:24    Post subject:
California's been smoke free for ages. It's fantastic.

Now when I go somewhere else I can tell the difference instantly. I almost asphyxiated in Las Vegas. Shocked
Erstwhile Lurker
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 4047
| Back to top
PostPosted: 01/08/03 - 03:05    Post subject:
I hate going into smoky places, too, but people who stay up all night gambling or get drunk in bars have a peculiar selectivity over their health issues, don't you think? Decent restaurants I have been in are seldom smoky even if they allow it at the bar or elsewhere. I reek when I leave the homes I appraise owned by smokers. Whether I think I should be able to tell them they can't smoke on private property is a whole different subject.
Erstwhile Lurker
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 4047
| Back to top
PostPosted: 01/08/03 - 03:19    Post subject:
I could live with a law which requires them to put a sign on the door that says, "Smoking permitted." If I did not care to patronize that place, I would go elswhere until I found an establishment that did not permit it.

Then the free market can decide. Smoking establishments will collapse if the majority of the public deems it that repugnant. But we all know this is really a backdoor way to ban smoking altogether, something no one has the guts to do. It's easier to peck around the edges.

Should we pass laws that say you can't smoke in your own house because you may be called on by appraisers, cable guys, cops, EMTs, refrigerator repairmen, babysitters or the like? Or your own kids need protection from you? It's certainly not healthful for them, and this is the logical extension of existing smoke-free laws.
akern
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 31 May 2002
Posts: 17149
Location: CTU
| Back to top
PostPosted: 01/08/03 - 09:12    Post subject:
I think we've hit a nerve.
purple hayes
Frightened Inmate #2
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 14462
Location: ON YOUR LEFT!
| Back to top
PostPosted: 01/08/03 - 09:22    Post subject:
I agree with EL. I think it should be left up to the customers and their $$$. Free enterprise will make its own choices.

Smoking is a nasty habit and if had a choice between a smoking restaurant 'A' and a non-smoking restaurant 'B', I'd choose 'B' and in essence cast my vote against restaurant 'A'.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous   1, 2

www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> Riff-Raff Hang Out

Page 2 of 2

Related topics:
*cough* *cough*