The time now is 09/07/08 - 08:48
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  
Calculator Running Log Uploads Smilies Calendar
FAQ Search    Articles Register Log in

disturbing statistic on poverty


www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> On-Topic Goto page Previous   1, 2

Post new topic   Reply to topic
runaroundsue
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 18 Sep 2002
Posts: 6629
Location: supporting GREENer pastures
| Back to top
PostPosted: 10/14/05 - 10:19    Post subject:
cherylpf wrote:
sonnylax wrote:
There are statistics and there are damn statistics.

The umployment "figures" from the government also probably includes people who willingly remove themselves from the work force due to their own financial independence or a whole host of different issues (not related to so called poverty).

No you are right that lacking a job does not necessarily mean poverty. However, the unemployment rate as I understand it from economics classes is defined as the percentage of employable work force that are unemployed and actually looking for jobs.


I'm pretty sure that this is right. I haven't "worked" for years and I don't count as unemployed and some years I do actually report income. Mr. Green If I started looking for a job today, though, I wonder how I'd ever become part of the unemployed crowd?
kristin31
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 8045
Location: Caught in the crossfire of childhood and stardom
| Back to top
PostPosted: 10/14/05 - 11:09    Post subject:
runaroundsue wrote:
cherylpf wrote:
sonnylax wrote:
There are statistics and there are damn statistics.

The umployment "figures" from the government also probably includes people who willingly remove themselves from the work force due to their own financial independence or a whole host of different issues (not related to so called poverty).

No you are right that lacking a job does not necessarily mean poverty. However, the unemployment rate as I understand it from economics classes is defined as the percentage of employable work force that are unemployed and actually looking for jobs.


I'm pretty sure that this is right. I haven't "worked" for years and I don't count as unemployed and some years I do actually report income. Mr. Green If I started looking for a job today, though, I wonder how I'd ever become part of the unemployed crowd?


I think you'd be considered a "discouraged worker", which means you stopped looking for work. You's be considered unemployed iff you got another job and then got laid off. I think.
sonnylax
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 30 Sep 2003
Posts: 2942
Location: Living in a lollipop and unicorn world
| Back to top
PostPosted: 10/14/05 - 14:28    Post subject:
I'm a discouraged worker, but I haven't stopped working.
MastrBrewr
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Reply with quote
Joined: 24 Sep 2003
Posts: 6974
Location: outside
| Back to top
PostPosted: 10/17/05 - 16:41    Post subject:
I thought unemployment statistics were just culled from the # of people contacting the ESC offices.
cherylpf
crazy cat lady
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 17305
| Back to top
PostPosted: 10/17/05 - 18:06    Post subject:
MastrBrewr wrote:
I thought unemployment statistics were just culled from the # of people contacting the ESC offices.

Is that where you get unemployment? If so, thats my impression too, except I think to continue receiving unemployment you have to prove you are actually looking for a job (Vandalay enterprises anyone?).
MechEngDropout
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 27 Jun 2003
Posts: 10474
Location: Off the grid
| Back to top
PostPosted: 10/18/05 - 01:56    Post subject:
cherylpf wrote:
MastrBrewr wrote:
I thought unemployment statistics were just culled from the # of people contacting the ESC offices.

Is that where you get unemployment? If so, thats my impression too, except I think to continue receiving unemployment you have to prove you are actually looking for a job (Vandalay enterprises anyone?).




My impression (and knowledge from sociology class, though small and possibly incorrect) is that unemployment percentage represents people that are actively looking for jobs but are unable to get one.
megawill
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 20 May 2002
Posts: 1552
| Back to top
PostPosted: 10/18/05 - 13:16    Post subject:
MechEngDropout wrote:
cherylpf wrote:
MastrBrewr wrote:
I thought unemployment statistics were just culled from the # of people contacting the ESC offices.

Is that where you get unemployment? If so, thats my impression too, except I think to continue receiving unemployment you have to prove you are actually looking for a job (Vandalay enterprises anyone?).




My impression (and knowledge from sociology class, though small and possibly incorrect) is that unemployment percentage represents people that are actively looking for jobs but are unable to get one.


How the Federal Government Measures Unemployment


---
megawill
cherylpf
crazy cat lady
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 17305
| Back to top
PostPosted: 10/18/05 - 20:51    Post subject:
megawill wrote:
MechEngDropout wrote:
cherylpf wrote:
MastrBrewr wrote:
I thought unemployment statistics were just culled from the # of people contacting the ESC offices.

Is that where you get unemployment? If so, thats my impression too, except I think to continue receiving unemployment you have to prove you are actually looking for a job (Vandalay enterprises anyone?).




My impression (and knowledge from sociology class, though small and possibly incorrect) is that unemployment percentage represents people that are actively looking for jobs but are unable to get one.


How the Federal Government Measures Unemployment


---
megawill

Thank you! I googled for a while looking for this and never found it!
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous   1, 2

www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> On-Topic

Page 2 of 2

Related topics:
Just received a disturbing voicemail...
Disturbing?
Shocking, disturbing and sexually explicit
disturbing trend
More disturbing trends
Good Dog, Needs New Home. Free!!! [Warning...Disturbing!]
disturbing?
Disturbing new trend...
only mildly disturbing
mildly disturbing only
Another piece of disturbing junkmail...
disturbing reality tv
A VERY disturbing trend
Most disturbing movie?
This is disturbing
Disturbing News...
Is there an official RiffRaff statistic...
So Spreadsheeter and Statistics Guy...(Cappy and HH)
Interesting Statistics