The time now is 07/09/08 - 04:56
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  
Calculator Running Log Uploads Smilies Calendar
FAQ Search    Articles Register Log in

The difference between racing and racing well


www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> Mid-Packers

Post new topic   Reply to topic
purple hayes
Frightened Inmate #2
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 14462
Location: ON YOUR LEFT!
| Back to top
PostPosted: 08/16/03 - 18:08    Post subject: The difference between racing and racing well
So...This whole decision to do (or not) a half Ironman is lurking before me. I've got one in Mid-Sept. that I can do and one a few weeks after that that I can also do (but not both). Both would require a drive and overnight stay.

My delema [sp?] is that I'm 95% sure that I can do the distance, but I'm not so sure that I can do the distance well. If I'm going to drive some where and pay for an overnight stay, I want to come home knowing that I was 100% prepared for the race and was able to give it all AND be happy with my finish time.

So, how do you decide if you're prepared for a race?
spongebob
Former FFL Champion
Reply with quote
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 3602
| Back to top
PostPosted: 08/16/03 - 19:27    Post subject:
The only way to get better at racing is to race.

I would do the first one. That way, if anything goes wrong at home or work, you always have the second one to fall back on.

You also decrease the chance of over training or picking up an injury.

Nobody is ever 100% ready for a race. You do your training and prepare, but race day is a whole new world and you deal with it as you go along. The more you race, the more you learn how to deal with the many little things that come up.

You can never expect to be 100% ready or expect to be happy with your finish time ( I don't know how many times I thought I sucked and set a PR and how many times I thought I rocked and finished 5 minutes slower than my most conservative of expectations). You only understand those two factors in hindsight.

But you can always give it your all. That is probably the only factor you control.

I vote for the 1st race. You have said that you don't race a lot, so I think you should get this IM quest under your belt ASAP.

Just Do It.
TimRuns
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 11 May 2003
Posts: 10062
Location: Coquitlam, British Columbia
| Back to top
PostPosted: 08/16/03 - 20:18    Post subject:
Runner X wrote:
The only way to get better at racing is to race.

I would do the first one. That way, if anything goes wrong at home or work, you always have the second one to fall back on.

You also decrease the chance of over training or picking up an injury.

Nobody is ever 100% ready for a race. You do your training and prepare, but race day is a whole new world and you deal with it as you go along. The more you race, the more you learn how to deal with the many little things that come up.

You can never expect to be 100% ready or expect to be happy with your finish time ( I don't know how many times I thought I sucked and set a PR and how many times I thought I rocked and finished 5 minutes slower than my most conservative of expectations). You only understand those two factors in hindsight.

But you can always give it your all. That is probably the only factor you control.

I vote for the 1st race. You have said that you don't race a lot, so I think you should get this IM quest under your belt ASAP.

Just Do It.

Well said X! thumbs up
runaroundsue
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 18 Sep 2002
Posts: 6629
Location: supporting GREENer pastures
| Back to top
PostPosted: 08/16/03 - 20:52    Post subject:
plus......if you feel you are 100%---you are no doubt overtrained. I like the 90% odds.....the days that you say...."hey, there's a chance I can pull something out"
shelee
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 2409
Location: IN
| Back to top
PostPosted: 08/17/03 - 09:52    Post subject:
Runner X wrote:
The only way to get better at racing is to race.

I would do the first one. That way, if anything goes wrong at home or work, you always have the second one to fall back on.

You also decrease the chance of over training or picking up an injury.

Nobody is ever 100% ready for a race. You do your training and prepare, but race day is a whole new world and you deal with it as you go along. The more you race, the more you learn how to deal with the many little things that come up.

You can never expect to be 100% ready or expect to be happy with your finish time ( I don't know how many times I thought I sucked and set a PR and how many times I thought I rocked and finished 5 minutes slower than my most conservative of expectations). You only understand those two factors in hindsight.

But you can always give it your all. That is probably the only factor you control.

I vote for the 1st race. You have said that you don't race a lot, so I think you should get this IM quest under your belt ASAP.

Just Do It.


what he said.
AlaninTX
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 6582
Location: Austin, Texas
| Back to top
PostPosted: 08/26/03 - 16:34    Post subject:
How are you going to know what "well" is until you have a baseline established during a race?

Time to saddle up.
Pebbles
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2002
Posts: 2947
Location: Bedrock
| Back to top
PostPosted: 08/26/03 - 18:32    Post subject:
Runner X wrote:
The only way to get better at racing is to race.

I would do the first one. That way, if anything goes wrong at home or work, you always have the second one to fall back on.

You also decrease the chance of over training or picking up an injury.

Nobody is ever 100% ready for a race. You do your training and prepare, but race day is a whole new world and you deal with it as you go along. The more you race, the more you learn how to deal with the many little things that come up.

You can never expect to be 100% ready or expect to be happy with your finish time ( I don't know how many times I thought I sucked and set a PR and how many times I thought I rocked and finished 5 minutes slower than my most conservative of expectations). You only understand those two factors in hindsight.

But you can always give it your all. That is probably the only factor you control.

I vote for the 1st race. You have said that you don't race a lot, so I think you should get this IM quest under your belt ASAP.

Just Do It.


SOOOOO GOOD!!!!! thumbs up
jrjo
Gone Fishin
Reply with quote
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 16451
Location: Lake Wobegon, MN
| Back to top
PostPosted: 08/28/03 - 10:13    Post subject:
Dittos on what X said...

Looking back at most of my PRs, they came on days I toed the line and wouldn't have predicted it. For unknown reasons, training, taper, diet and raceday come together and a peak performance transpires.
Of course you can be an 'engineer' about it and cross all the t's and dot all the i's making the outcome fairly predictable, but personally, I like to leave a little bit to irrationality and race even when I'm not ready.
kobyj
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 24 Jul 2002
Posts: 2370
Location: Lake Pine
| Back to top
PostPosted: 08/28/03 - 12:35    Post subject:
The first race should be one that you just race to experience. That way you can get a feel for what times, cravings, injuries, etc. to expect in future races. When you can plan for those things and know how to overcome them, then you can have a fast time. But I don't think you can have a fast time at a race of that kind of distance without a few practice races for preparation.

I'm along with everyone else.

NIKE!
TriBob
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 29 Aug 2002
Posts: 5771
Location: Lost in Transition
| Back to top
PostPosted: 08/28/03 - 12:49    Post subject:
It is hard to define racing well for a sport you are new to and a distance your have never done before.

Pick the one that fits your schedule the best and go have fun. Like others, my best races are ones that I don't put pressure on myself. I race relaxed and usually lay down a pretty good time.
Happy2tri
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 02 May 2003
Posts: 1003
Location: Boston, MA
| Back to top
PostPosted: 08/28/03 - 17:04    Post subject:
Has a decision been reached??? Either way I say you win just by signing up and I am sure with your level of training be it the sooner or later you will do great. I have a feeling it may be one of those great race-type days that keep us training.............and perhaps before you know it you will be writing your own full ironman report!!

The 1/2 ironman is just so fun, the perfect distance, long enough to feel you really did something substantial but short enough that you don't feel like you are going to die out there, and short enough that a normal person can fit in the training time.

Let us know your decision.
Floridaboiler
POTFH
Reply with quote
Joined: 18 May 2002
Posts: 11322
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
| Back to top
PostPosted: 09/01/03 - 19:00    Post subject:
shelee wrote:
Runner X wrote:
The only way to get better at racing is to race.

I would do the first one. That way, if anything goes wrong at home or work, you always have the second one to fall back on.

You also decrease the chance of over training or picking up an injury.

Nobody is ever 100% ready for a race. You do your training and prepare, but race day is a whole new world and you deal with it as you go along. The more you race, the more you learn how to deal with the many little things that come up.

You can never expect to be 100% ready or expect to be happy with your finish time ( I don't know how many times I thought I sucked and set a PR and how many times I thought I rocked and finished 5 minutes slower than my most conservative of expectations). You only understand those two factors in hindsight.

But you can always give it your all. That is probably the only factor you control.

I vote for the 1st race. You have said that you don't race a lot, so I think you should get this IM quest under your belt ASAP.

Just Do It.


what he said.


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT - 4 Hours

www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> Mid-Packers

Page 1 of 1

Related topics:
Altitude difference?
Differences in day and night pace
WHAT A DIFFERENCE A YEAR MAKES.....30 YEARS?
leg length difference
Differences (Probably not appropriate for opening at work!)
Poll not poll :: Greatest age difference while dating?
Difference difference between Liberal & Conservative
waht a difference water makes
Time Difference between Marathon 1 and Marathon 2
Not poll: gender based differences in sexual harrassment
Differences in water
What a difference... a day makes.
A difference in perspective
What a difference 24 hours makes
technical differences between the CH and Riff Raff forums
Religion Differences and Relationships
Differences between men and women part XXXVII
30 minutes makes a difference
why the big difference?
Differences Between You And Your Boss
Difference between (HR Question)
What's the difference
What's the difference
wow, what a difference!
What's the difference
Choice of words makes all the difference.
Difference between Men and Women
Do shoes make that big of difference?
Bikes, what are the differences?
The difference between "Reply" and "Reply All
Difference between stress fractures and shin splints
The Difference Between Left and Right
How much of a difference do you think a shoe makes?
Heart Rate differences on trainer
Difference between Water resistant and waterproof?
In-Betweener
rest between sets
A conversation between Delta and Omega
What is that groove for between your nose and upper lip?
Between the sheets
Where's the line between slacking and taking needed rest?
Birthday's between now and Dec 31
I am thinking of a number between 1 and 3,984
A thin line between love and hate.
Book Review: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
i'm thinking of a number between 1 and 30.
If a bake off is a contest between bakers what do you call a
If you had to choose between -
There's a fine line between ultrarunning and insanity
Pauses between runs
Pause between marathons