|
|
|
|
jrjo
Gone Fishin
|
|
|
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 16451
Location: Lake Wobegon, MN
|
| Back to top
|
|
 Posted: 05/31/05 - 09:46 Post subject: So you wanna bike fast
|
|
|
|
|
JACKED UP
PRESIDENT
|
|
|
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 21238
Location: www.johnnydu.com
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 05/31/05 - 10:34 Post subject:
 No thanks! 
|
|
|
|
|
Dancer
Member
|
|
|
Joined: 21 Nov 2002
Posts: 2518
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/01/05 - 06:45 Post subject:
That's hella scarry!!! Don't show my hubby that, he'll want one.
|
|
|
|
|
Cappy
Excelent
|
|
|
Joined: 16 May 2002
Posts: 27368
Location: Spreadsheetylvania
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/30/05 - 21:04 Post subject:
So who was your partner? 
|
|
|
|
|
copteacher
Adjunct
|
|
|
Joined: 08 Jun 2002
Posts: 20588
Location: Teaching in the Halls of Justice
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 07/01/05 - 02:56 Post subject:
I don't think I want to be pedaling on the back of that thing.
|
|
|
|
|
crazyfrog
Kermitologist
|
|
|
Joined: 31 May 2003
Posts: 7610
Location: atlanta
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 07/01/05 - 21:29 Post subject:
| rtpd113 wrote: | | I don't think I want to be pedaling on the back of that thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
HYPERASHEL
Member
|
|
|
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 15397
Location: The South's Sauna, Atlanta
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 07/05/05 - 11:02 Post subject:
| rtpd113 wrote: | | I don't think I want to be pedaling on the back of that thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
runaroundsue
Member
|
|
|
Joined: 18 Sep 2002
Posts: 6629
Location: supporting GREENer pastures
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 08/02/05 - 13:04 Post subject:
is it more aerodynamic backwards???
we already have a regular tandem (hubby&son), they can go pretty fast!!!!
unfair because I just have a tag-along for Bryce, the kiddo on the back doesn't really have to pedal. I'm so waiting for Bryce to have a growth spurt so we can show them up
|
|
|
|
|
TriBob
Member
|
|
|
Joined: 29 Aug 2002
Posts: 5771
Location: Lost in Transition
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 08/02/05 - 13:23 Post subject:
| runaroundsue wrote: | is it more aerodynamic backwards???
we already have a regular tandem (hubby&son), they can go pretty fast!!!!
unfair because I just have a tag-along for Bryce, the kiddo on the back doesn't really have to pedal. I'm so waiting for Bryce to have a growth spurt so we can show them up |
How big is he?
You could use a Trail-a-bike. Good for the inbetween years
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/adams-trail-a-bike.html
|
|
|
|
|
RunXner
Newbie
|
|
|
Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 4
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 04/13/06 - 22:39 Post subject: no so fast..
this one goes 67mph, less vision more protection~Double Gold Rush
|
|
|
|
|
.jrjo
Member
|
|
|
Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Posts: 900
Location: Lake Wobegon, MN
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 04/13/06 - 22:50 Post subject: Re: no so fast..
| RunXner wrote: | this one goes 67mph, less vision more protection~Double Gold Rush
|
THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT!! 
|
|
|
|
|
MechEngDropout
Member
|
|
|
Joined: 27 Jun 2003
Posts: 10474
Location: Off the grid
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 04/14/06 - 09:07 Post subject:
They really don't look like they're going that fast.
|
|
|
|
