The time now is 12/03/08 - 21:57
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  
Calculator Running Log Uploads Smilies Calendar
FAQ Search    Articles Register Log in

Should protesters be permitted to disrupt military funerals?


www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> On-Topic Goto page Previous   1, 2

Post new topic   Reply to topic
airehead
Oompa Loofah
Reply with quote
Joined: 12 Nov 2002
Posts: 18788
Location: Between here and eternity...
| Back to top
PostPosted: 05/09/06 - 19:08    Post subject:
camelia bedelia wrote:
airehead wrote:
camelia bedelia wrote:
What I don't get, is what are the Phelps clan protesting about at these military funerals? What point are they trying to get across? It doesn't seem connected to the funerals at all, just a place to get media attention, or am I missing something??

I am very torn on this issue. Mostly I come down on the side of freedom of speech, but protesting at a funeral is beyond the bounds of decency. And 'protesting' by shouting hateful slogans is abhorrent. I would like to think common decency would regulate that kind of thing, but unfortunately there are a lot of cruel people out there.


They're attention getters.


I think (think) they protested at Matthew Shepard's funeral as well.


They did. With signs that said "Matthew Shepard is in Hell". How very Christian of them.


I know, huh?

They represent true Christianity about as well as the 9/11 bombers represent true Islam. Sad


Last edited by airehead on 05/09/06 - 23:47; edited 1 time in total
RangerG
Bounty Hunter
Reply with quote
Joined: 13 Mar 2003
Posts: 7301
Location: Gmail Server Number 126
| Back to top
PostPosted: 05/09/06 - 20:49    Post subject:
camelia bedelia wrote:
What I don't get, is what are the Phelps clan protesting about at these military funerals? What point are they trying to get across? It doesn't seem connected to the funerals at all, just a place to get media attention, or am I missing something??

I am very torn on this issue. Mostly I come down on the side of freedom of speech, but protesting at a funeral is beyond the bounds of decency. And 'protesting' by shouting hateful slogans is abhorrent. I would like to think common decency would regulate that kind of thing, but unfortunately there are a lot of cruel people out there.



See for yourself:

http://www.godhatesfags.com/main/index.html

http://www.godhatesfags.com/fliers/may2006/20060507_ten-dead-troops.pdf

These folks do not subscribe to common decency. Rev Phelps is nuts...but Phelp's daughter is crazier than Jim Jones... Total brain wash....
camelia bedelia
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 2808
Location: God's Country
| Back to top
PostPosted: 05/09/06 - 21:39    Post subject:
RangerG wrote:
camelia bedelia wrote:
What I don't get, is what are the Phelps clan protesting about at these military funerals? What point are they trying to get across? It doesn't seem connected to the funerals at all, just a place to get media attention, or am I missing something??

I am very torn on this issue. Mostly I come down on the side of freedom of speech, but protesting at a funeral is beyond the bounds of decency. And 'protesting' by shouting hateful slogans is abhorrent. I would like to think common decency would regulate that kind of thing, but unfortunately there are a lot of cruel people out there.



See for yourself:

http://www.godhatesfags.com/main/index.html

http://www.godhatesfags.com/fliers/may2006/20060507_ten-dead-troops.pdf

These folks do not subscribe to common decency. Rev Phelps is nuts...but Phelp's daughter is crazier than Jim Jones... Total brain wash....


I'm familar with Phelps and Co, I just didn't know what the military connection was and why they wanted to Thank God for Dead Soldiers. (I refuse to go to any site they promote).

When Phelps dies, do you think people will show up at his service with signs that say "Fred Phelps is in Hell"?
RangerG
Bounty Hunter
Reply with quote
Joined: 13 Mar 2003
Posts: 7301
Location: Gmail Server Number 126
| Back to top
PostPosted: 05/10/06 - 06:11    Post subject:
camelia bedelia wrote:
When Phelps dies, do you think people will show up at his service with signs that say "Fred Phelps is in Hell"?


Poetic justice would be for no one to show up at Fred's funeral except the backhoe operator. To show up with signs would be to stoop to his level.

Some people exist simply to serve as an example of how NOT to live your life.
kobyj
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 24 Jul 2002
Posts: 2370
Location: Lake Pine
| Back to top
PostPosted: 05/10/06 - 18:01    Post subject:
camelia bedelia wrote:

I'm familar with Phelps and Co, I just didn't know what the military connection was and why they wanted to Thank God for Dead Soldiers. (I refuse to go to any site they promote).


I believe that they protest at funerals just to get attention. And if that's their "mission", then mission successful.

I visit their website everyonce in a while to just do a little research on the "enemy" in sense. This way I'm educated and can actually state facts regarding them. Plus everytime I visit their site, I get fired back up and am eager to ride anywhere for a mission.
GaRebelRunner
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 26 Sep 2003
Posts: 1097
Location: Tucker, GA
| Back to top
PostPosted: 05/10/06 - 20:28    Post subject:
I may be pretty much out there in left field, but I can't imagine why there should even be any discussion on this topic. The answer to the question is simply no.
airehead
Oompa Loofah
Reply with quote
Joined: 12 Nov 2002
Posts: 18788
Location: Between here and eternity...
| Back to top
PostPosted: 05/10/06 - 20:53    Post subject:
GaRebelRunner wrote:
I may be pretty much out there in left field, but I can't imagine why there should even be any discussion on this topic. The answer to the question is simply no.


I agree with you 100%.


But it's always good to discuss laws and their possible future ramifications.
kristin31
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 8045
Location: Caught in the crossfire of childhood and stardom
| Back to top
PostPosted: 05/11/06 - 18:39    Post subject:
airehead wrote:
camelia bedelia wrote:
airehead wrote:
camelia bedelia wrote:
What I don't get, is what are the Phelps clan protesting about at these military funerals? What point are they trying to get across? It doesn't seem connected to the funerals at all, just a place to get media attention, or am I missing something??

I am very torn on this issue. Mostly I come down on the side of freedom of speech, but protesting at a funeral is beyond the bounds of decency. And 'protesting' by shouting hateful slogans is abhorrent. I would like to think common decency would regulate that kind of thing, but unfortunately there are a lot of cruel people out there.


They're attention getters.


I think (think) they protested at Matthew Shepard's funeral as well.


They did. With signs that said "Matthew Shepard is in Hell". How very Christian of them.


I know, huh?

They represent true Christianity about as well as the 9/11 bombers represent true Islam. Sad




Those people are so full of misdirected hate that they will wind up pickled to death in ignorance and rage at something beyond their understanding. To use a military funeral as an excuse to get themselves attention is very wrong. It may be in their constitutional rights, but it is wrong to me.

(This is from someone who is totally anti-war, and therefore against this war, but I would never, ever protest the war at a funeral or protest and cause a scene or do anything to denigrate soldiers coming home from Iraq. They are only following orders, however f'ed up the orders might be).

Phelps and his little cult are disrespectful, nasty rude intolerant bigots.
The people that fought and died deserve some respect and their families deserve that as well as peace.
airehead
Oompa Loofah
Reply with quote
Joined: 12 Nov 2002
Posts: 18788
Location: Between here and eternity...
| Back to top
PostPosted: 05/11/06 - 21:45    Post subject:
kristin31 wrote:
airehead wrote:
camelia bedelia wrote:
airehead wrote:
camelia bedelia wrote:
What I don't get, is what are the Phelps clan protesting about at these military funerals? What point are they trying to get across? It doesn't seem connected to the funerals at all, just a place to get media attention, or am I missing something??

I am very torn on this issue. Mostly I come down on the side of freedom of speech, but protesting at a funeral is beyond the bounds of decency. And 'protesting' by shouting hateful slogans is abhorrent. I would like to think common decency would regulate that kind of thing, but unfortunately there are a lot of cruel people out there.


They're attention getters.


I think (think) they protested at Matthew Shepard's funeral as well.


They did. With signs that said "Matthew Shepard is in Hell". How very Christian of them.


I know, huh?

They represent true Christianity about as well as the 9/11 bombers represent true Islam. Sad




Those people are so full of misdirected hate that they will wind up pickled to death in ignorance and rage at something beyond their understanding. To use a military funeral as an excuse to get themselves attention is very wrong. It may be in their constitutional rights, but it is wrong to me.

(This is from someone who is totally anti-war, and therefore against this war, but I would never, ever protest the war at a funeral or protest and cause a scene or do anything to denigrate soldiers coming home from Iraq. They are only following orders, however f'ed up the orders might be).

Phelps and his little cult are disrespectful, nasty rude intolerant bigots.
The people that fought and died deserve some respect and their families deserve that as well as peace.


I agree. I hate drug dealers and pedophiles and all they stand for but I don't think I'd ever protest at their funerals. That's their time to meet their maker.
andydp
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 8122
Location: Upstate NY near Albany
| Back to top
PostPosted: 05/12/06 - 14:03    Post subject:
The only thing I will say is the same statement I make whenever something like this crops up:

The ACLU is protecting the rights of dirtbags because...if they don't protect the dirtbags' rights, pretty soon WE will be the dirtbags.

Believe me, I think protesting at a funeral is not the place to do it. By using this venue, Fred has made his fringe, whack job position well known.
Gogirlgo
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 25 Jul 2002
Posts: 4777
Location: No deal, stalker.
| Back to top
PostPosted: 05/14/06 - 22:02    Post subject:
OK, yeah. But the whole job for lunatic fringe groups is to get those in the mainstream to back the message, which you can't do when you look like a f*cking lunatic like this guy.

It's the same thing with EarthFirst!, the group that spikes trees for loggers to hurt themselves in order to protest the impact of the loggers on the environment. No matter how important or even correct their message might be, it's all in the way they go about it.

And when you have a totally horrid message like Phelps does, it's real hard. You're alienating your potential fanbase by choosing the method of funeral-crashing. Even the gay-bashers draw the line at this.
Aslowhiteguy
Newbie
Reply with quote
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 4
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/06 - 16:16    Post subject:
couldn't they be stopped w/o creating a new law?
don't you need a permit to protest on a public street/place? if so the permit could specify they must maintain a certain distance from the actual event.
couldn't they be prevented from entering or protesting in a church or private cemetery? the right to protest doesn't extend to private property, does it?

i would support a law preventing protests at any funeral. it's sad we need laws to inforce what should be common decency and courtesy.
Gogirlgo
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 25 Jul 2002
Posts: 4777
Location: No deal, stalker.
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/06 - 22:46    Post subject:
I spoke to a guy I know yesterday, hadn't seen him for a while. Turns out it was one of his cousins who was killed a few weeks ago around here.

Phelps and Co. were there. The family was outraged. The cops actually told the family, "If you want us to just turn around for a few minutes, say the word."
Gogirlgo
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 25 Jul 2002
Posts: 4777
Location: No deal, stalker.
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/05/06 - 22:48    Post subject:
Aslowhiteguy wrote:
couldn't they be stopped w/o creating a new law?
don't you need a permit to protest on a public street/place? if so the permit could specify they must maintain a certain distance from the actual event.
couldn't they be prevented from entering or protesting in a church or private cemetery? the right to protest doesn't extend to private property, does it?

i would support a law preventing protests at any funeral. it's sad we need laws to inforce what should be common decency and courtesy.


Streets and parks have been historically public venues. Sometimes a permit is required. But a permit isn't always written to be limiting. I think this one is going up b/c the SC needs to create a legal entity around this activity, like it does for certain other ones.
Capt Kirk
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 120
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/06/06 - 15:52    Post subject: The problems with protestors
Sometimes people protest just to protest without regard to the venue, who is there, or even the subject.

This law is being passed in Colorado where I now live. The funeral of the soldier that was killed had nothing to do with what was being protested; he wasn't gay.

Free speech is right that comes with responsibilities. 1st ammendment says you say what you want, but its doesn't say I have to hear it. Protest somewhere else, write a letter to the editor, whatever. BUT the 1st Ammendment does not allow people to invade private venues and events. And stopping someone from entering a private venue/event is NOT infringing in 1st Amnt rights.

Another thing, know what your talking about when you go protest. I mean, the law does'nt say you have to know, but....Example: the mass of the people that were protesting the World Trade Organization meetings: most of the folks, when asked, had no idea of what they were protesting. They really didn't know what the WTO was, or any of the issues. They were protesting because someoen told them to. (That's a liberal example, conservatives do the same thing....)

When you ask most guys in the 60's why they were protesting, most would tell you thats' where the girls were...
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous   1, 2

www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> On-Topic

Page 2 of 2

Related topics:
Nekkid protesters in Brazil
Disruption of Space/Time Continueum?
I love being a military wife...
Rewriting of Military Law
The Complete Military History of France
French Military Victories
Military Secrets
I"m avoiding the Bush military record thread
Should Bush's military record be an issue
Anyone know how to write a member of our military
Military question
Military Admits Error
Military Movies
The Military Channel
Military Base Closing list
Military Recruiting
Today I saw a military convoy....
What the term "Mission" means to the military
So my wife watched a show on the Military Channel last night
Help me get an 8 minute mile so I can join the military
27 ways to kill a snake using the US Military
The military controls the weather
Some important Military rules to follow
Five Military Amputee Teams Will Run 2007 'Army Ten Miler'
Question for military runners?
Speakin' of funerals
Do funerals count against vacation days?