The time now is 12/04/08 - 01:52
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  
Calculator Running Log Uploads Smilies Calendar
FAQ Search    Articles Register Log in

Poll for Liberals


www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> Riff-Raff Hang Out Goto page Previous   1, 2, 3, 4   Next

Post new topic   Reply to topic

I'm voting for John Kerry in November, because:
of his outstanding charisma
20%
 20%  [ 2 ]
I agree with his voting record
10%
 10%  [ 1 ]
he's not George W. Bush
70%
 70%  [ 7 ]
Total Votes : 10

sonnylax
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 30 Sep 2003
Posts: 2942
Location: Living in a lollipop and unicorn world
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/18/04 - 15:30    Post subject:
Runner X wrote:
Will commoners be allowed to vote this year?


Did you pay taxes or own any land?

(Said somewhat seriously....)
thegman
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 23 Sep 2002
Posts: 3088
Location: 12 yards out.
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/18/04 - 15:31    Post subject:
Runner X wrote:
If the commoners do get to vote this year, who is going to supervise? And should their votes count towards the actual election?


Stop asking questions. And get back to work.
cherylpf
crazy cat lady
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 17305
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/18/04 - 15:40    Post subject:
Runner X wrote:
If the commoners do get to vote this year, who is going to supervise? And should their votes count towards the actual election?

I think they count but as 1/3 vote.
runaroundsue
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 18 Sep 2002
Posts: 6629
Location: supporting GREENer pastures
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/18/04 - 16:45    Post subject:
Wicked Flea wrote:
All of the above, but agree with most of his positions.
Environment, Pro-Choice, Gay Marriage

genie wrote:
Says a lot for the moron, that no one's voting out of confidence that he is really the man for the job, doesn't it?



I don't think there are enough liberals (what 3 or 4) on this forum to leap to that assumption.



which is strange....I'm pro environment, pro choice, and pro gay marriage.....yet I don't cast my vote on the candidate's belief in these areas. I really think the presidency has no power (and not too much influence) in these social issues. I also consider myself a moderate and I'm with you on these social issues dunno

I have a feeling that when we hit the polls, we won't be pulling the same lever.
cherylpf
crazy cat lady
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 17305
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/18/04 - 16:52    Post subject:
runaroundsue wrote:
Wicked Flea wrote:
All of the above, but agree with most of his positions.
Environment, Pro-Choice, Gay Marriage

genie wrote:
Says a lot for the moron, that no one's voting out of confidence that he is really the man for the job, doesn't it?



I don't think there are enough liberals (what 3 or 4) on this forum to leap to that assumption.



which is strange....I'm pro environment, pro choice, and pro gay marriage.....yet I don't cast my vote on the candidate's belief in these areas. I really think the presidency has no power (and not too much influence) in these social issues. I also consider myself a moderate and I'm with you on these social issues dunno

I have a feeling that when we hit the polls, we won't be pulling the same lever.

My friends and I were just talking about this the other day, that the big social issues the president has no power in and therefore a lot of us don't vote with our opinions on those. I guess people vote on that because the president appoints the Supreme court justices?
runaroundsue
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 18 Sep 2002
Posts: 6629
Location: supporting GREENer pastures
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/18/04 - 17:01    Post subject:
cherylpf wrote:
runaroundsue wrote:
Wicked Flea wrote:
All of the above, but agree with most of his positions.
Environment, Pro-Choice, Gay Marriage

genie wrote:
Says a lot for the moron, that no one's voting out of confidence that he is really the man for the job, doesn't it?



I don't think there are enough liberals (what 3 or 4) on this forum to leap to that assumption.



which is strange....I'm pro environment, pro choice, and pro gay marriage.....yet I don't cast my vote on the candidate's belief in these areas. I really think the presidency has no power (and not too much influence) in these social issues. I also consider myself a moderate and I'm with you on these social issues dunno

I have a feeling that when we hit the polls, we won't be pulling the same lever.

My friends and I were just talking about this the other day, that the big social issues the president has no power in and therefore a lot of us don't vote with our opinions on those. I guess people vote on that because the president appoints the Supreme court justices?


is one getting ready to croak, that we have to worry about a swing? dunno My understanding is that they lean conservative (if you think they voted in Bush in the first place)...yet Roe/Wade is still on the books and didn't the first gay marriage happen under Bush...whom, has never given me the impression of accepting gays.
copteacher
Adjunct
Reply with quote
Joined: 08 Jun 2002
Posts: 20588
Location: Teaching in the Halls of Justice
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/18/04 - 19:22    Post subject:
I think most people voting for Kerry are against Bush. I think a corpse could have run on the party and the corpse still would have gotten 40% of the vote (the same too could be said for repubs too)

The key is the 20% in the middle. I think they will vote the issues whatever they feel strongest about. Though I think it will be less about Charisma and more about who appears more presidential.
copteacher
Adjunct
Reply with quote
Joined: 08 Jun 2002
Posts: 20588
Location: Teaching in the Halls of Justice
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/18/04 - 19:29    Post subject:
no one will be surprised at this answer to the quiz

Quote:
According to your answers, your political philosophy is right-conservative.

Conservative
Right-conservatives prefer self-government on economic issues, but want official standards in personal matters. They want the government to defend the community from threats to its moral fiber.
runaroundsue
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 18 Sep 2002
Posts: 6629
Location: supporting GREENer pastures
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/18/04 - 19:36    Post subject:
libertarian.

Libertarian
Libertarians are self-governors in both personal and economic matters. They believe government's only purpose is to protect people from coercion and violence. They value individual responsibility, and tolerate economic and social diversity.

Wow...thought that was a pretty small quiz....but this is a pretty good summary
runaroundsue
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 18 Sep 2002
Posts: 6629
Location: supporting GREENer pastures
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/18/04 - 19:44    Post subject:
rtpd113 wrote:
I think most people voting for Kerry are against Bush. I think a corpse could have run on the party and the corpse still would have gotten 40% of the vote (the same too could be said for repubs too)

The key is the 20% in the middle. I think they will vote the issues whatever they feel strongest about. Though I think it will be less about Charisma and more about who appears more presidential.


that's a pretty safe statement as I don't see a whole lot of charisma being tossed around Confused
kattzoo
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 3813
Location: Happily at the back of the pack
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/18/04 - 20:25    Post subject:
runaroundsue wrote:
libertarian.

Libertarian
Libertarians are self-governors in both personal and economic matters. They believe government's only purpose is to protect people from coercion and violence. They value individual responsibility, and tolerate economic and social diversity.

Wow...thought that was a pretty small quiz....but this is a pretty good summary


Me too! I can't say I'm shocked. I would have considered a Democratic canidate, was somewhat impressed and intriqued by Edwards, but I'm not a fan of Kerry's. I'm not unhappy with the President either, but not so enamored I wouldn't have considered a change.
brie k
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 5661
Location: where the wild things are
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/19/04 - 08:43    Post subject:
rtpd113 wrote:
no one will be surprised at this answer to the quiz

Quote:
According to your answers, your political philosophy is right-conservative.

Conservative
Right-conservatives prefer self-government on economic issues, but want official standards in personal matters. They want the government to defend the community from threats to its moral fiber.


same here. It fits.
GaRebelRunner
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 26 Sep 2003
Posts: 1097
Location: Tucker, GA
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/19/04 - 17:30    Post subject:
brethelm wrote:
??? I think foreign policy is where George W. shines best.


You can't be serious. Dubya is the biggest jerk and most asinine excuse we have ever had for a President. Remember when Reagan lost those Marines lives in Lebanon? He made sure he did not waste any more American lives. Reagan knew how to lead the nation, even if I disagreed with him on most of his policies. Dubya invades an independent country that has nothing to do with 9/11 for his and Cheney's own personal gains. He has turned what was the world's sympathy for the U.S. into sarcasm. And you consider foreign policy where Dubya shines?!

I've vote for Jacques Chirac or Putin for U.S. President before I'd vote Dubya. Yuck!
sonnylax
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 30 Sep 2003
Posts: 2942
Location: Living in a lollipop and unicorn world
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/19/04 - 17:58    Post subject:
GaRebelRunner wrote:
Dubya invades an independent country (snip)...


So when Clinton "invades" Kosovo it's OK? Just trying to see where you are coming from GRR. You do see the double standard (I hope). Neutral
Cappy
Excelent
Reply with quote
Joined: 16 May 2002
Posts: 27368
Location: Spreadsheetylvania
| Back to top
PostPosted: 06/19/04 - 18:24    Post subject:
GaRebelRunner wrote:
I've I'd vote for Jacques Chirac or Putin for U.S. President before I'd vote Dubya. Yuck!


Neither of whom were born in this country, so they couldn't be elected.

Thank goodness for Clause 5, Section1, of Article II of the Constitution, because I wouldn't want a socialist President leading this great nation
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous   1, 2, 3, 4   Next

www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> Riff-Raff Hang Out

Page 3 of 4

Related topics:
proof that liberals are slowly gaining power....