The time now is 11/23/08 - 07:55
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  
Calculator Running Log Uploads Smilies Calendar
FAQ Search    Articles Register Log in

Janet Jackson's "accidental" exposure at the Super


www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> Riff-Raff Hang Out Goto page Previous   1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6   Next

Post new topic   Reply to topic
purple hayes
Frightened Inmate #2
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 14462
Location: ON YOUR LEFT!
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 18:05    Post subject:
Pebbles wrote:
Ding ding!! We have a winnah! That's exactly what it is....
Not that I know anything about it..... *bolts for the door*

Snopes has a disgustingly close-up picture of said apparatus.

http://snopes.com/photos/risque/superbowl.asp - Link not safe for work

Disclaimer :: Snopes is usually a pretty decent site. I thought they gave warnings about nudity on their site, but they didn't for this one.
genie
Master of Prissface
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 16194
Location: Finding serenity one day at a time
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 18:09    Post subject:
Running Brewer wrote:
Runner X wrote:
Speaking of out of place sexuality, is it just me or did anyone else notice there are now 3 different pills available that help men obtain erections.

And all 3 had Super Bowl adds.

Does this disturb anyone else?


and then JJ goes and shows a boob, coincidence? I think not!


jrjo is showing his boobs now? How'd I miss that? Twisted Evil
Pug
The Movie Geek
Reply with quote
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Posts: 8924
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 18:14    Post subject:
purple hayes wrote:
Pebbles wrote:
Ding ding!! We have a winnah! That's exactly what it is....
Not that I know anything about it..... *bolts for the door*

Snopes has a disgustingly close-up picture of said apparatus.

http://snopes.com/photos/risque/superbowl.asp - Link not safe for work

Disclaimer :: Snopes is usually a pretty decent site. I thought they gave warnings about nudity on their site, but they didn't for this one.


There is a less appropriate one at the Drudge Report.
Pebbles
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2002
Posts: 2947
Location: Bedrock
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 18:14    Post subject:
genie wrote:
Running Brewer wrote:
Runner X wrote:
Speaking of out of place sexuality, is it just me or did anyone else notice there are now 3 different pills available that help men obtain erections.

And all 3 had Super Bowl adds.

Does this disturb anyone else?


and then JJ goes and shows a boob, coincidence? I think not!


jrjo is showing his boobs now? How'd I miss that? Twisted Evil


Wait...Jrjo has boobs? Who knew???

Now where is Elkid with that manboob pic...
genie
Master of Prissface
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 16194
Location: Finding serenity one day at a time
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 18:32    Post subject:
Pebbles wrote:
genie wrote:
Running Brewer wrote:
Runner X wrote:
Speaking of out of place sexuality, is it just me or did anyone else notice there are now 3 different pills available that help men obtain erections.

And all 3 had Super Bowl adds.

Does this disturb anyone else?


and then JJ goes and shows a boob, coincidence? I think not!


jrjo is showing his boobs now? How'd I miss that? Twisted Evil


Wait...Jrjo has boobs? Who knew???

Now where is Elkid with that manboob pic...


LOL
blue
your favorite weapon
Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2002
Posts: 7010
Location: armed and ambitious
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 18:32    Post subject:
brie k wrote:
blue wrote:
saw the clip on kazaa (those boys are FAST)...

she's not covered. i think she was *supposed* to be covered, but definately wasn't... and she seemed pretty friggin surprised about it, cuz she looks down kinda confused like something was missing.

at any rate, apparently MTV won't be planning a superbowl halftime show again Wink

not too sure what the point of the stunt was, it's not like JJ needs that kinda hype.


Look again. Here's a site that has a couple pics of her "performance" (enter site, it's in the photos for 2004)

http://www.janet-xone.com/



well you would appear right, the video isn't the best quality.

*personally* i'd rather have just had her pose. at least that looks sexy and doesn't seem so desperate... this just looked, odd?
brie k
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 5661
Location: where the wild things are
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 19:31    Post subject:
Pug wrote:
purple hayes wrote:
Pebbles wrote:
Ding ding!! We have a winnah! That's exactly what it is....
Not that I know anything about it..... *bolts for the door*

Snopes has a disgustingly close-up picture of said apparatus.

http://snopes.com/photos/risque/superbowl.asp - Link not safe for work

Disclaimer :: Snopes is usually a pretty decent site. I thought they gave warnings about nudity on their site, but they didn't for this one.


There is a less appropriate one at the Drudge Report.


yeesh. That just HURTS me...
andydp
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 8122
Location: Upstate NY near Albany
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 19:48    Post subject:
I'm sure its been said before:

What did you expect when MTV is the producer ?

Wardrobe malfunction my a$$ !

Appropriate for TV at about midnight maybe not for prime time.

Now, with all this talk: Are Justin and Janet about to release an album ? What was the old Hollywood quote ? "ANY publicity is good publicity." there's more talk about those two now than there has been in months...
prohemp
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 7716
Location: in the cradle of liberty
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 22:15    Post subject:
camelia bedelia wrote:
You have to know, that after offering their "apologies" all parties involved are grinning and high fiving over the controversty they started. All over a "wardrobe mishap".


wardrobe malfunction - I think that better describes what happens when you're giving a speech before the League of Women Voters, and suddenly your pants fall down and your underwear inexplicably combusts Shocked
kattzoo
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 3813
Location: Happily at the back of the pack
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 22:44    Post subject:
Glad to see Janet's at least honest. (or mostly) She claims that they planned it, but it wasn't to go so far. (the lace was to remain) She also says CBS and MTV had no idea what they were up to.
airehead
Oompa Loofah
Reply with quote
Joined: 12 Nov 2002
Posts: 18788
Location: Between here and eternity...
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 22:45    Post subject:
prohemp wrote:
camelia bedelia wrote:
You have to know, that after offering their "apologies" all parties involved are grinning and high fiving over the controversty they started. All over a "wardrobe mishap".


wardrobe malfunction - I think that better describes what happens when you're giving a speech before the League of Women Voters, and suddenly your pants fall down and your underwear inexplicably combusts Shocked


maybe by "wardrobe malfunction" they meant more was supposed to come off than just that one part?


I sure hope not....
kristin31
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 8045
Location: Caught in the crossfire of childhood and stardom
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/03/04 - 00:51    Post subject:
Apparently I am the only person in the US who did not see this until now. If you're going for unplanned nipple exposure effect, then don't wear a pastie.
MM
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 04 Apr 2003
Posts: 611
Location: Next door to Crazy Mary
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/03/04 - 10:20    Post subject:
It's easy for the NFL, CBS, and MTV to denounce the incident and claim they knew nothing about it now that the publicity has been achieved. This is all that's being talked about. How many times have you heard the words Super Bowl, NFL, CBS, MTV, and Janet Jackson the past two days? I'm sure each party is really torn up about all the attention they're getting from the little publicity stunt.

By the way, Janet Jackson has a new single coming out this week. I'm sure that's just a coincidence, though.
kattzoo
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 3813
Location: Happily at the back of the pack
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/03/04 - 14:54    Post subject:
MM wrote:
It's easy for the NFL, CBS, and MTV to denounce the incident and claim they knew nothing about it now that the publicity has been achieved. This is all that's being talked about. How many times have you heard the words Super Bowl, NFL, CBS, MTV, and Janet Jackson the past two days? I'm sure each party is really torn up about all the attention they're getting from the little publicity stunt.

By the way, Janet Jackson has a new single coming out this week. I'm sure that's just a coincidence, though.


OKAY! Who is posting as MM, because this actually made sense, so it can't be him. Wink Mr. Green
camelia bedelia
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 2808
Location: God's Country
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/03/04 - 14:57    Post subject:
By the way, the latest is that there was supposed to be a red lacy bra when the bustier was ripped away. That's their story and their sticking to it.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous   1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6   Next

www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> Riff-Raff Hang Out

Page 5 of 6

Related topics:
Wimmins...accidental exposure?