The time now is 11/23/08 - 07:23
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  
Calculator Running Log Uploads Smilies Calendar
FAQ Search    Articles Register Log in

Janet Jackson's "accidental" exposure at the Super


www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> Riff-Raff Hang Out Goto page Previous   1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6   Next

Post new topic   Reply to topic
rolling rock
The Pinball
Reply with quote
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 16218
Location: unknown zone
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 13:06    Post subject:
maybe it runs in the family -- accidental (NOT) exposures.
she's completely had it with that kook brother of hers stealing all the thunder. gimmmeee some of that headline..

i was quick to explain to my daughter that NO, it isn't cool to let some twirp rip your shirt off (in public or private) even if it is Just in timetogetevenwithbritneythetramp timberlake. losah.

and there was talk of her piercing shining in the spotlight? i wasn't that focused. Shocked
Pug
The Movie Geek
Reply with quote
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Posts: 8924
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 13:08    Post subject:
rolling rock wrote:
maybe it runs in the family -- accidental (NOT) exposures.
she's completely had it with that kook brother of hers stealing all the thunder. gimmmeee some of that headline..

i was quick to explain to my daughter that NO, it isn't cool to let some twirp rip your shirt off (in public or private) even if it is Just in timetogetevenwithbritneythetramp timberlake. losah.

and there was talk of her piercing shining in the spotlight? i wasn't that focused. Shocked


That's not a piercing. Think of it as a star with a hole in the middle attached to the nipple.
Sahara
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 17 May 2002
Posts: 3345
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 13:10    Post subject:
no big deal
As daughter number one said, "If that was real, that was real bad".
brie k
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 5661
Location: where the wild things are
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 13:23    Post subject:
blue wrote:
saw the clip on kazaa (those boys are FAST)...

she's not covered. i think she was *supposed* to be covered, but definately wasn't... and she seemed pretty friggin surprised about it, cuz she looks down kinda confused like something was missing.

at any rate, apparently MTV won't be planning a superbowl halftime show again Wink

not too sure what the point of the stunt was, it's not like JJ needs that kinda hype.


Look again. Here's a site that has a couple pics of her "performance" (enter site, it's in the photos for 2004)

http://www.janet-xone.com/
camelia bedelia
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 2808
Location: God's Country
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 13:41    Post subject:
You have to know, that after offering their "apologies" all parties involved are grinning and high fiving over the controversty they started. All over a "wardrobe mishap".
keltic63
the kilted one
Reply with quote
Joined: 17 May 2002
Posts: 8574
Location: under the weather
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 13:45    Post subject:
Pug wrote:
That's not a piercing. Think of it as a star with a hole in the middle attached to the nipple.


it's prolly a piercing. I've seen this jewelry. the star has a small hole in the center, but it's held in place by the piercing jewelry ie a "barbell."
coachmarkos
my boys could swim
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 11387
Location: 1st in AFC West
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 13:47    Post subject:
Having reviewed the evidence....

Would it be inappropriate for me to say...

"Nice Rack" Wink

C'mon people, it's just a boob.

I do think it was inappropriate to have on TV when children are watching, but....it's not that bad. Remember when the Dice man said his nursery rhymes live on MTV...now that is offensive.
Running Brewer
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 12 Oct 2004
Posts: 3872
Location: Santa Poco
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 13:51    Post subject:
Even though I do think it was an inapporiate act to start controversy so JJ could sell and album or two. I think we have thin skin. Even Andrew Dice clay, come on. If you don't like it, don't watch it. It is that simple.
purple hayes
Frightened Inmate #2
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 14462
Location: ON YOUR LEFT!
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 13:56    Post subject:
Running Brewer wrote:
If you don't like it, don't watch it. It is that simple.

I'm pretty sure that most people watching the half-time show didn't expect to see a booby displayed though.
camelia bedelia
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 2808
Location: God's Country
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 13:56    Post subject:
Running Brewer wrote:
Even though I do think it was an inapporiate act to start controversy so JJ could sell and album or two. I think we have thin skin. Even Andrew Dice clay, come on. If you don't like it, don't watch it. It is that simple.


It's kinda hard to choose not to watch something you don't know is coming.
HYPERASHEL
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 15397
Location: The South's Sauna, Atlanta
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 13:57    Post subject:
Being a healthy hetero male i did not have a problem with it. Mr. Green

HOWEVER i did quickly think, "how could they do that?" yes due to kids watching, religeous folks and well hetero woamen don't really want to see her boobs.

However i already had a coined a term for this years SB just knowing the contaversy started by JJ. BOOBIE BOWL 2004 Mr. Green
thegman
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 23 Sep 2002
Posts: 3088
Location: 12 yards out.
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 14:30    Post subject:
purple hayes wrote:
Running Brewer wrote:
If you don't like it, don't watch it. It is that simple.

I'm pretty sure that most people watching the half-time show didn't expect to see a booby displayed though.


I would expect those who did signed up for the lingerie bowl.
kattzoo
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 3813
Location: Happily at the back of the pack
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 14:46    Post subject:
It shot my theory that Janet and Michael are really one and the same.
Pug
The Movie Geek
Reply with quote
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Posts: 8924
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 14:53    Post subject:
kattzoo wrote:
It shot my theory that Janet and Michael are really one and the same.


Nah, that's Michael and Latoya.
omega lambda
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 4691
| Back to top
PostPosted: 02/02/04 - 15:11    Post subject:
camelia bedelia wrote:
You have to know, that after offering their "apologies" all parties involved are grinning and high fiving over the controversty they started. All over a "wardrobe mishap".




Yup, laughing all the way to the bank. "Wardrobe mishap", indeed.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous   1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6   Next

www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> Riff-Raff Hang Out

Page 3 of 6

Related topics:
Wimmins...accidental exposure?