The time now is 08/21/08 - 21:56
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  
Calculator Running Log Uploads Smilies Calendar
FAQ Search    Articles Register Log in

Brothers Found Guilty of Terrorism Support


www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> On-Topic

Post new topic   Reply to topic
sonnylax
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 30 Sep 2003
Posts: 2942
Location: Living in a lollipop and unicorn world
| Back to top
PostPosted: 04/14/05 - 08:51    Post subject: Brothers Found Guilty of Terrorism Support
As noted in blog world... Ghassan Elashi was the founder of the Texas chapter of the Council on American Islamic Relations—CAIR. A fact omitted by virtually all of mainstream media. Another strike for the peaceful little religion of Islam.

Quote:
Brothers Found Guilty of Terrorism Support

By DAVID KOENIG, Associated Press Writer

DALLAS - Three Dallas-area brothers were convicted Wednesday of supporting terrorism by funneling money to a high-ranking official in the militant Palestinian group Hamas.

Ghassan and Bayan Elashi and their company were found guilty of all 21 federal counts they faced: conspiracy, money laundering and dealing in property of a terrorist. Basman Elashi, who faced the same counts, was convicted of three counts of conspiracy but acquitted of the other charges.


The brothers, all born in the Middle East, were convicted the same day jurors began deliberating, after nearly two weeks of testimony, and are to be sentenced Aug. 1. Prosecutors said each count carries a maximum 10-year prison sentence.


"We hope it sends a message that we are going to vigorously pursue terrorists' assets," prosecutor Nathan Garrett said.


Ghassan Elashi, free pending sentencing, left without commenting.


"It's hard times for people of Middle Eastern descent," said his lawyer, Tim Evans.


Prosecutors said the men tried to hide a $250,000 investment by Hamas official Mousa Abu Marzook in their Richardson computer company by making it look as if it came from his wife. Payments were allegedly funneled to Marzook in return for the investment.


Then-Attorney General John Ashcroft announced the Elashis' indictments in 2002, calling the defendants "terrorist money men."


Marzook lived in Louisiana and Virginia until 1995, when the federal government labeled him a terrorist, which made it illegal for anyone in the United States to have financial dealings with him. Marzook was deported and is believed living in Syria.


Prosecutors said the Elashis' computer company, InfoCom Corp., continued to make payments to Marzook's wife until 2001.


Prosecutors presented evidence from wiretapped conversations, financial documents and InfoCom employees that they said showed the Elashis were dealing with Marzook and not his wife.


In closing arguments Tuesday, attorneys for the Elashis said prosecutors had failed to prove that the men broke any laws.


Defense lawyer Michael P. Gibson vowed to appeal and said prosecutors had sensationalized the case.


"There is no evidence that money ever funded any terrorism," Gibson said. "This is not a terrorism case, it's a financial crimes case."


Defense attorneys said Marzook's wife — Nadia Elashi, a cousin of the defendants — controlled the $250,000 invested in InfoCom. They said she used the payments she received in return to cover living expenses, not to support terrorism.


The Elashis' lawyers also said government officials knew about the arrangement between InfoCom and the Marzooks for several years but took no action to stop it.

Marzook and his wife were named in the same indictment as the Elashis but have not been captured.

The three Elashis and two of their brothers were convicted last year on separate charges of making illegal technology shipments to Libya and Syria, countries the U.S. government considers state sponsors of terrorism. All five are awaiting sentencing in that case.

The Elashis also were active in the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, a Muslim charity that was shut down in 2001 after the government accused it of funneling more than $12 million to Hamas. The charity is expected to go on trial early next year.


http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050413/ap_on_re_us/hamas_trial_1
copteacher
Adjunct
Reply with quote
Joined: 08 Jun 2002
Posts: 20588
Location: Teaching in the Halls of Justice
| Back to top
PostPosted: 04/14/05 - 13:06    Post subject:
There are as many hateful extremes of every group. I am glad the bad guys are caught and that it does show that the U.S. is making a dent against Terrorism where it really is at is heart, money.
Though Islam has a conatation of being a terrorism religion for the most part they live peaceful lives.
My personal feelings aside. I think this news story has been reported here but does not need to be responded to.
Therefore I am going to lock this thread down before it gets nasty as some people here feel strongly on both sides about Islam.
copteacher
Adjunct
Reply with quote
Joined: 08 Jun 2002
Posts: 20588
Location: Teaching in the Halls of Justice
| Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/05 - 14:18    Post subject:
keep it civil people.
TOsteve
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 1468
Location: Out for a run
| Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/05 - 14:25    Post subject: Re: Brothers Found Guilty of Terrorism Support
sonnylax wrote:
As noted in blog world... Ghassan Elashi was the founder of the Texas chapter of the Council on American Islamic Relations—CAIR. A fact omitted by virtually all of mainstream media. Another strike for the peaceful little religion of Islam.


Unless I'm misreading what you've said here, you're attacking the entire Islamic religion based on anecdotal evidence? Please explain how this is not displaying a blatant prejudice.

I'm willing to admit that I misunderstood if you can clear up the miscommunication.
Gogirlgo
Member
Reply with quote
Joined: 25 Jul 2002
Posts: 4777
Location: No deal, stalker.
| Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/05 - 14:37    Post subject:
I think whatever the point of the threadwriter is immediately becomes illegitimate when blatant racism is part of it.

If the writer means to make his message meaningful, he might first think about how his audience, some of whom may be slightly to his left, will receive it. If he just wants to hurl invective, this isn't the place. But I'm sure that's not the case.
copteacher
Adjunct
Reply with quote
Joined: 08 Jun 2002
Posts: 20588
Location: Teaching in the Halls of Justice
| Back to top
PostPosted: 04/15/05 - 14:56    Post subject:
he also pointed out "censorship" by the media and not reporting all of the facts of the story
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT - 4 Hours

www.runningforums.com Forum Index -> On-Topic

Page 1 of 1

Related topics:
my brothers SUCK!
3 brothers
Band of Brothers
Movie Review: Two Brothers (2004)
older brothers...
My brothers Cat
My brothers cat...
Book Review: Beyond Band of Brothers, Dick Winters, MAJ USA
band of brothers
Little sisters get better treatment than older brothers
Terrorism's root causes
the Toddler of Terrorism
MP3, Taxi Drivers, The Clash, Terrorism
I have been asked to lead a bioterrorism conference
please support runswithscissors
"Support Our Troops" indeed
Thank You for the support.
The crowd support factor
Supporting the troops VS Agreeing with the policy
Student support group: vent/cheer here.....
where is that support check?
On being supportive...
Your support please (UPDATE)
I support the USA men's basketball team.
PMS support thread-mins enter with caution!
Men's PMS Support Thread - Ladies please ignore (Updated)
Arch Support
What to eat to support very early AM runs?
I support our local police but....
Arch Support Insert/Wrap
Tech support.
She may/may not support the war...
2008 tour de cure orlando (support needed)