|
|
|
|
JACKED UP
PRESIDENT
|
|
|
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 21238
Location: www.johnnydu.com
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/29/04 - 13:32 Post subject: Beep Beep........ POHO comin' through.....
So I was wondering since I've become a posting whore, how long it will take me to break the top 50. I pm'ed someone(WHOSHALLREMAINNAMELESS) who is good with numbers and they said if I keep up my current posting rate of 200 in about 2 weeks and you all keep your current rate up as well, it will take about 117 days.
So be still will ya.
|
|
|
|
|
robp
Pyromaniac
|
|
|
Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Posts: 16242
Location: Waiting in line at the beer store...
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/29/04 - 13:34 Post subject: Re: Beep Beep........ POHO comin' through.....
| JACKED UP wrote: | So I was wondering since I've become a posting whore, how long it will take me to break the top 50. I pm'ed someone(WHOSHALLREMAINNAMELESS) who is good with numbers and they said if I keep up my current posting rate of 200 in about 2 weeks and you all keep your current rate up as well, it will take about 117 days.
So be still will ya.  |
A lofty goal indeed. I think you should go for the gold and try to do it in 100 days.....
|
|
|
|
|
gretriever
Hipster Doofus
|
|
|
Joined: 16 Jul 2003
Posts: 19385
Location: A moving target in a firing range.
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/29/04 - 13:37 Post subject: Re: Beep Beep........ POHO comin' through.....
| robp wrote: |
A lofty goal indeed. I think you should go for the gold and try to do it in 100 days..... | Here's a hint to help you do this.
I could name names, but I'm in the penalty box with some people already.
|
|
|
|
|
HYPERASHEL
Member
|
|
|
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 15397
Location: The South's Sauna, Atlanta
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/29/04 - 13:52 Post subject:
| Quote: | | WHOSHALLREMAINNAMELESS |
Lord Voldemort?
|
|
|
|
|
Cappy
Excelent
|
|
|
Joined: 16 May 2002
Posts: 27368
Location: Spreadsheetylvania
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/29/04 - 13:55 Post subject:
Here is an analysis of the of average post's per day needed to break into the top 50.
|
|
|
|
|
Pug
The Movie Geek
|
|
|
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Posts: 8924
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/29/04 - 13:59 Post subject:
| Cappy wrote: | Here is an analysis of the of average post's per day needed to break into the top 50.
 |
I'm just baffled. Seriously. I look in Excel and think "ooh, a grid! I wonder if i can draw Garfield with some crayons" So i try it, and fail, and then wonder what solvent can get crayon off of my monitor without ruining the monitor.
|
|
|
|
|
Cappy
Excelent
|
|
|
Joined: 16 May 2002
Posts: 27368
Location: Spreadsheetylvania
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/29/04 - 14:08 Post subject:
This is a better one. I added some formulas to calculate the date based on the number of days
|
|
|
|
|
HYPERASHEL
Member
|
|
|
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 15397
Location: The South's Sauna, Atlanta
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/29/04 - 14:08 Post subject:
| Cappy wrote: | Here is an analysis of the of average post's per day needed to break into the top 50.
 |
Does that include the rate of posting for the present 50th place?
|
|
|
|
|
JACKED UP
PRESIDENT
|
|
|
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 21238
Location: www.johnnydu.com
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/29/04 - 14:11 Post subject:
| Cappy wrote: | Here is an analysis of the of average post's per day needed to break into the top 50.
 |
wow, he was right!
|
|
|
|
|
gretriever
Hipster Doofus
|
|
|
Joined: 16 Jul 2003
Posts: 19385
Location: A moving target in a firing range.
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/29/04 - 14:16 Post subject:
| Pug wrote: |
I'm just baffled. Seriously. I look in Excel and think "ooh, a grid! I wonder if i can draw Garfield with some crayons" So i try it, and fail, and then wonder what solvent can get crayon off of my monitor without ruining the monitor. |
|
|
|
|
|
BobM59
Member
|
|
|
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 695
Location: MA
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/29/04 - 14:21 Post subject:
Nice work there, Cappy.
I'm thinking top 50 is something that probably won't be a realistic goal for me anytime soon, sadly enough.
|
|
|
|